 
|
| Click below and go to KPUT Bios and Future Obits and read about four guys who aspire to become famous enough that their images will be forever memorialized in clip art. |
| E-mail us at kput@kput.org to give feedback and receive monthly notifications of site updates. All attachements will be deleted, unless they are accompanied by penis enlargement clip art. |
| Click below and go to the KPUT Archives for more pages that feature other stock images of chicken stock, livestock and Woodstock. |
| Copyright 2008 KPUT Komedy Ink. All rights reserved. |
| April 2008 |
Not Updated KPUT Archives |
| A. The man sitting had his nose violently removed before this drawing was made. B. The person pointing at the board is of an ambiguous sexuality. C. The other guy can’t fold his arms. D. The entire picture was originally used for racist purposes. |
| QUESTION #1 |
| ANSWER: D. According to the now defunct Korel WordDrawings company, the original description of this clip art was: “Man Being Informed By Colored People That He Is As White As This Piece Of Paper – White White Whitey-Ass White.” DISCONTINUED January 16, 2004. |
 |
| This clip art was discontinued in 2004 because: |
| QUESTION #2 |
 |
| A. The implied lazy behavior of middle managers. B. The not-so-subtle message that moving up the corporate ladder “leaves you black and blue.” C. The insulting depiction of conjoined twins running businesses. D. The palatable fear that executives nationwide would suddenly break into song and dance like Fred Astaire and Gene Kelly. |
| ANSWER: C. While deemed “completely unintentional” by its creators, the offending image suggests that all conjoined twin business owners are connected at the shoulder. The Clipped Arts Corporation suffered a painful backlash from angry twins worldwide. “If we could run on our three legs,” wrote one pair of managers, “we’d be right down there to smash your faces with our good arm!” REMOVED March 22, 2005. |
| This image of two executives caused quite a stir thanks to: |
| QUESTION #3 |
| A. Joyfully feeding her own jacket into the desktop shredder. B. Giddy with excitement because she now has her very own Commodore Vic 20. C. Drunkenly declaring her illicit affair with “this compu’er server, righ’ herrre!” D. Proudly showing off a bleeding stapler wound to the hair. |
| ANSWERS: A & D. The creators Graffix ‘N’ More had to declare bankruptcy after admitting to distributing this portrayal of a businesswoman engaged in machine-assisted mutilation. Among the complaints from rioters: “What does this tell our young women? That we can only be happy when suffering? Bring back the images of cute ladies fending off the advances of horny male co-workers. THAT’s the reality of my workplace!” BANNED July 30, 2006 |
| Riots caused by this clip art seem justified when you notice this woman is: |
 |
| A. Office workers would print this and substitute it for the real item. B. Managers would project this on screens during meetings to instill fear in their underperforming employees. C. Corporate training manuals bearing this image on the first page were often stolen and set on fire. D. Nobody knows what this thing is. |
| ANSWER: D. To this day, even the design firm won’t admit the original inspiration for this clip art. OUTLAWED FOREVER AND EVER December 19, 2007 |
| This piece of clip art raised many eyebrows because: |
 |
| QUESTION #4 |
 |
 |
| covers the |
| Corporate clip art. It brings to mind cheerful cartoon people, distorted objects and childlike wonder. Yet many clip art pieces created for corporate use actually express some of the most sinister and horrific messages the world has ever seen. These deliberately manufactured images have undermined productivity and done irreparable damage to the workplace. Sure, these graphics may look innocent. But, as with everything else, there are reasons to ban them. Take this simple quiz and see how much you know about Controversial Corporate Clip-Art! |
| If you see these images or any others like them at your workplace, please contact your local authorities or send a note to CCC@CTCCCA.org. |
 |
| This message was paid for by the Committee To Counter Controversial Clip Art. Underwritten entirely by: |
| Drama-free images since 1993 |
 |
 |
| The material on this website has been inserted, resized and very poorly positioned by: Ben DeJean Hector DeJean Glen Keenan Steve Scholz |
 |
|
 |